Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
wiki:open_discussion [2014/03/14 08:56]
j_e_f_f_g [Rename / Split long Category Tags]
wiki:open_discussion [2014/03/15 08:27] (current)
j_e_f_f_g
Line 18: Line 18:
  
   * [[apps:​categories:​linux_audio_bundles_distributions_and_music_collections]]   * [[apps:​categories:​linux_audio_bundles_distributions_and_music_collections]]
- 
-===== Current Version and Date Field for Apps Table  ===== 
- 
-For a more expressive overview it would be nice if the applications table had columns listing the latest version it's release date. A "​simple audio editor"​ from 2007 is in many cases more useful than an "​advanced editor"​ from, say 2001.  ​ 
- 
-Example: 
- 
-^ Application ​ ^ Description ^ Version ​ ^ released ^ Features ^ 
-|Audacity ​  ​|cross-platform soundfile editor with many nice features ​   |1.2.6 |2006-10-30 ​  | LP | 
- 
- 
- 
-===== Tagging rules for plugins ===== 
-I ran into some inconsistencies regarding the tagging around plugins. 
-I'd be willing to fix this but don't want to decide on my own. 
- 
-**questions:​** 
- 
-(my suggestion y/n) 
- 
-  * tag: "​[[apps:​categories:​audio_plugin_systems_for_linux]]"​ for  
- 
-the apps page for plugin type (y)  
- 
-hosts (n)  
- 
-plugins (n)  
- 
-(following this suggestion the category would give an overview over avaliable plugin formats, ATM this category is of little value, containing an incomplete is a mixture of hosts, plugins and plugin systems) 
- 
-  * tag: "<​plugin_type_name>" ​ (i.e. [[apps:​categories:​LADSPA]]) 
- 
-apps page for plugin type? (n)  
- 
-plugin? (n) 
- 
-host? (y) 
- 
-(probably a disadvantage of this suggestion: the little DS, LP or LV2 icons in application lists will only appear with host apps, not with plugins. to me this makes sense, those icons then inform about compatibility,​ plugins have their own tag (see below)) ​ 
- 
-  * tag: "<​plugin_type_name>​_Plugins"​ (i.e. [[apps:​categories:​LADSPA_Plugins]]) ​ 
- 
-ok, thats clear, only for plugins 
- 
-\\ 
-any comments? ​ 
- 
-===== Vamp plugins license issue? ===== 
- 
-I added the Vamp plugin category. Just now I realised that the Vamp SDK is liscensed under a "​new-style BSD" licence. Does this give any reason for exclusion of Vamp from this wiki? don't think so but unsure. 
- 
  
wiki/open_discussion.1394783815.txt.gz ยท Last modified: 2014/03/14 08:56 by j_e_f_f_g